Comments on: Now that is what I call a Google update https://websitebuilding.biz/seo/may-2010-google-update/ News and guides for online business Tue, 18 May 2010 09:30:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: UK Shopping Cart Software https://websitebuilding.biz/seo/may-2010-google-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12969 Tue, 18 May 2010 09:30:58 +0000 http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=1273#comment-12969 The new user interface is something I do not like at all. However, for 2 or 3 of my websites I’ve seen some interesting fluctuations for some heavy keywords, some in a positive way others in a negative way. Just hope to settle this so-called “dance”, I do not like when keywords fluctuate heavily. 🙂

]]>
By: Bing and Yahoo gained market share before the Google Update https://websitebuilding.biz/seo/may-2010-google-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12952 Wed, 12 May 2010 17:42:05 +0000 http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=1273#comment-12952 […] growth may explain Google’s willingness to roll out a new search update with a visual new design. But will the unfamiliar and more cluttered look cause surfers to try a […]

]]>
By: John at Website Building biz https://websitebuilding.biz/seo/may-2010-google-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12951 Mon, 10 May 2010 14:36:19 +0000 http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=1273#comment-12951 I haven’t seen any evidence of new ranking methods, just a little bit of the usual dance. I would still expect that people might see different levels of traffic, but mostly just because searches have more ways to organize the results based on their preferences.

Or then again, a lot of people have been criticizing the “clutter” and feel of the new UI, so Google might even lose a little bit of market share on this one…

]]>
By: Business Logos https://websitebuilding.biz/seo/may-2010-google-update/comment-page-1/#comment-12950 Mon, 10 May 2010 10:08:18 +0000 http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=1273#comment-12950 It is not clear if this was done in conjunction with an algo update. Has any one seen any significant changes in their ranking?

]]>