Comments on: New content – stale until proven otherwise? https://websitebuilding.biz/blogging/new-content-stale-until-proven-otherwise/ News and guides for online business Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:11:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: Too fresh for your niche https://websitebuilding.biz/blogging/new-content-stale-until-proven-otherwise/comment-page-1/#comment-13908 Mon, 12 Dec 2011 06:48:59 +0000 http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=1852#comment-13908 […] a good bit of time this week trying to figure out exactly what happened with the most recent “freshness update” to come down the pipes from […]

]]>
By: Rick, Leeds https://websitebuilding.biz/blogging/new-content-stale-until-proven-otherwise/comment-page-1/#comment-13832 Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:41:56 +0000 http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=1852#comment-13832 I agree with most of what you say here.

Using links to judge quality of a site works in theory, but is too easy to game by article spinning etc, and so any proper “quality content” needs to get unnatural links before it starts getting natural ones from real people who actually enjoy that content.

However, I do think it makes sense to keep writing good content, as hopefully those natural links will come after the initial push is made and people actually see your site.

I personally think the biggest problem of the links system is that the system was designed for finding information, not for finding products or services. It came about before the internet was overly commercial.

Ultimately, you don’t judge how good, say, a plumber is by how many good quality articles they have written on their website. Forcing companies to write lots of content in order to push their sites up the listings seems a waste of everyone’s time.

That said, the local listings seems a way forward. If searches for services were ordered by locality to you, rather than by SEO factors, then that seems a much fairer system for businesses.

]]>