﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Killed Internet Democracy: The Republic of Authority Reigns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://websitebuilding.biz/seo/web-democracy-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://websitebuilding.biz/seo/web-democracy-dead/</link>
	<description>News for Online Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:22:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google pushes another search update &#124; SEO</title>
		<link>http://websitebuilding.biz/seo/web-democracy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-27175</link>
		<dc:creator>Google pushes another search update &#124; SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=763#comment-27175</guid>
		<description>[...] Also emphasized is &#8220;aggressive&#8221; link building and &#8220;link schemes.&#8221; While they won&#8217;t go in to too much detail here, the growing consensus among search watchers is that bad links are actually becoming a negative signal rather than something Google just ignores. Again, the idea is to punish websites that intentionally build links for the purpose of increasing their ranks, but I have to wonder just how accurate their analysis is. At the least, it is a big jump in the trend toward shrinking the part of the internet that gets a vote. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also emphasized is &#8220;aggressive&#8221; link building and &#8220;link schemes.&#8221; While they won&#8217;t go in to too much detail here, the growing consensus among search watchers is that bad links are actually becoming a negative signal rather than something Google just ignores. Again, the idea is to punish websites that intentionally build links for the purpose of increasing their ranks, but I have to wonder just how accurate their analysis is. At the least, it is a big jump in the trend toward shrinking the part of the internet that gets a vote. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging is dead &#8211; long live blogging!</title>
		<link>http://websitebuilding.biz/seo/web-democracy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-12818</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging is dead &#8211; long live blogging!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=763#comment-12818</guid>
		<description>[...] comments, site directories, and even social media sites eliminated from the link popularity charts, the number of people who actually get a vote on the internet seems to have declined despite the arrival of all these great &#8220;participatory&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comments, site directories, and even social media sites eliminated from the link popularity charts, the number of people who actually get a vote on the internet seems to have declined despite the arrival of all these great &#8220;participatory&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

