﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Bubble 2.0 &#8211; Too Big to Profit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://websitebuilding.biz/business/bubble-20-too-big-to-profit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://websitebuilding.biz/business/bubble-20-too-big-to-profit/</link>
	<description>News for Online Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John at Website Building biz</title>
		<link>http://websitebuilding.biz/business/bubble-20-too-big-to-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-11685</link>
		<dc:creator>John at Website Building biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=470#comment-11685</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not entirely sure if Youtube is currently profitable!  It probably helps Google that they&#039;re getting paid directly for their ads (basically cutting out the Adsense publisher and crowd-sourcing the editing on crowd-sourced [and often stolen] content).  There&#039;s some huge lawsuits pending, so I guess the profitability of the site is somewhat at the whim of the courts.

Anyway, Google hasn&#039;t indicated that they&#039;re acquiring or expanding, but it is possible that they&#039;re stashing cash and cutting costs so they can buy up more heavily trafficked domains at distressed asset prices.  

I dunno, my instinct is selling off quickly to an established big fish is a good strategy for someone who makes an extremely popular website with a vague monetization plan.  Unfortunately, the price they&#039;re going for is crashing and there are fewer buyers than a year or two ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely sure if Youtube is currently profitable!  It probably helps Google that they&#8217;re getting paid directly for their ads (basically cutting out the Adsense publisher and crowd-sourcing the editing on crowd-sourced [and often stolen] content).  There&#8217;s some huge lawsuits pending, so I guess the profitability of the site is somewhat at the whim of the courts.</p>
<p>Anyway, Google hasn&#8217;t indicated that they&#8217;re acquiring or expanding, but it is possible that they&#8217;re stashing cash and cutting costs so they can buy up more heavily trafficked domains at distressed asset prices.  </p>
<p>I dunno, my instinct is selling off quickly to an established big fish is a good strategy for someone who makes an extremely popular website with a vague monetization plan.  Unfortunately, the price they&#8217;re going for is crashing and there are fewer buyers than a year or two ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Logos</title>
		<link>http://websitebuilding.biz/business/bubble-20-too-big-to-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-11684</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Logos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://websitebuilding.biz/?p=470#comment-11684</guid>
		<description>I see your point. These companies build a community/customer base then think - how can I ammortize. Most just want to be sold, but they don&#039;t consider how to profit from the technology. Its a gamble....but some succeed, look at YouTube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your point. These companies build a community/customer base then think &#8211; how can I ammortize. Most just want to be sold, but they don&#8217;t consider how to profit from the technology. Its a gamble&#8230;.but some succeed, look at YouTube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

